30 Sep
Written on September 30 2009 and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Advertisement
Recent Posts
- Halo: Reach Multiplayer Beta Trailer Reveals Something Special
- Peter Molyneux Tweets About “Special Feature” in Fable III
- Dear Activision, Have You Lost Your Minds?
- E-Xpress Interactive Reveals March 2010 Releases
- NVidia: “PCs Set to Surpass Consoles by 2015″
- Killzone 2 Has 72% More Head Polygon Count than Halo: Reach
- Drop in PS3/360 Sales After May Till September 2010 Likely
- Impressive Bioshock 2 Big Daddy Wood Carving
- David Jaffe’s “Reviews” Comment Was Apparently Misinterpreted
- Epic Games President: “No Unreal, Working on Gears”, E3 to be “Really Exciting for Epic Fans”
Recent Comments
- Yvonmukluk on Halo: Reach Multiplayer Beta Trailer Reveals Something Special
- Unequalled on Final Fantasy VII: PSN Release versus PS3 Remake
- | Balu | on Dear Activision, Have You Lost Your Minds?
- Yvonmukluk on Killzone 2 Has 72% More Head Polygon Count than Halo: Reach
- bx on Killzone 2 Has 72% More Head Polygon Count than Halo: Reach
One Response to “comparison 5”
This comparison would be better if they were the same type of environment. Here we see Crysis at a more open area allowing more unfiltered light during mid day or afternoon. However, in the U2 shot we have a closed environment with filtered light that appears to be near evening. The shots are set up so that, at first glance, we see better lighting and draw distance in Crysis but, upon inspection we just have apples to oranges.
Leave a Reply