Your a douche, obviously its not that simple. The writer of this article clearly states why he believes that user generated reviews are problematic and why they should be taken with a grain of salt. Your comment on the otherhand simply elevates his point by showing that you are in fact the type of person he’s talking about.

You fail, Please try again at something that doesn’t require any form of intelligence.

I look at one of the best games that came out years ago and were rated 10/10: Zelda: Ocarina of Time, Metal Gear Solid, Soul Calibur etc. As you can tell why these games were rated 10/10 was because of the graphics ahead of time, gameplay and re playability.

Now in the 6th and 7th gen, nearly perfected good games only get a 9/10 or if you call it 9.5/10 (9.8). What is the point? why can’t they be rated a 10/10? I never played Ocarina of Time during the era it came out, I later played it on the Game Cube just 2/3 years ago. I never found it too interesting because I had seen better things. I played Ninja Gaiden Black, a near flawness game! Gamers who played Ninja Gaiden complained about the difficulty and camera, now with Black released, those issues were fixed and even adding extra contents. So why does it still get a 9.5/10!???

Recently played Gears of War 2, I never enjoyed GOW 1 online and storyline was too short. After playing this, GOW 2 fixed all the problematic issues, not only fixing it, but making it 10x better! Better graphics, better gameplay, better game types, better campaign and better multiplayer. So why does this get a 9/10???

It’s like these reviewers can’t get enough of something, judge a game too much or complain over little issues.

Don’t trust gaming site reviews, they are all biased and fanbased! If you want a site with gaming reviews, look for the ones that judge a game by its good (pros) and bad (cons). GameTrailers is one of them. IGN is out of the list!

Better yet, play a game yourself and judge it yourself.

“Why you can’t trust user reviews – You can’t trust user reviews due to the fact that they are done by a user (not a journalist), and could be biased.” END ARTICLE FOREVER.

You fail. Please try again at something that doesn’t need to be discussed.